FAQs – Interfering with Judicial Proceedings
What is “interfering with judicial proceedings” in Arizona?
Knowingly disobeying a court’s lawful order/mandate (often a protective or no-contact order) or engaging in covered conduct like disrupting court, refusing the oath, or juror non-compliance—charged under A.R.S. § 13-2810.
Is violating an order of protection the same thing?
Often, yes—the charge is commonly filed as Interfering with Judicial Proceedings when an order of protection or injunction against harassment is allegedly violated.
Is IJP a misdemeanor or a felony?
It’s a Class 1 misdemeanor (max 6 months jail, fines up to $2,500 + surcharges, up to 3 years probation). Actual outcomes depend on facts, history, and court.
Do I have to know about the order to be guilty?
The State must prove you knowingly disobeyed a lawful order. Service/notice matters. We scrutinize whether you were served or clearly advised (e.g., signed release conditions or judge warnings).
What if the protected person contacted me first?
Orders bind you, not the other party. Their contact may help in mitigation, but you can still be charged if you respond contrary to the order. We argue context and seek the best path forward.
Do texts, social media, or “going through a friend” count as contact?
They can, if the order prohibits direct or indirect contact. We parse the order’s language and the digital trail carefully.
What defenses apply most often?
Lack of service/notice, ambiguous terms, no “knowing” violation, mistaken identity, invalid/expired orders, and suppression issues with digital or police evidence.
Can these cases be reduced, diverted, or dismissed?
Sometimes—especially where service/notice is weak, the order’s scope is unclear, or the evidence is thin. Early, targeted negotiation helps.
Will this go on my record? Can it be fixed later?
A conviction creates a criminal record. Depending on the outcome, you may later pursue set-aside relief; eligibility is case-specific.